pappu
10-18 03:08 PM
and the write-up mostly talks about illegal immigration.
While quoting, discussing such links helps the members of this forum somewhat in keeping the buzz, I feel we must have focussed efforts on specific provisions that will improve the issues faced by legal immigrants. It is possible that this is easier to achieve than a Comprehensive Immigration Reform that this articles speaks about. Thanks to apnair2002 for the post.
Welcome Learning01 on the forum after a brief hiatus. You are the current record holder for maximum number of posts and I hope you continue to post messages helping all members on the forum. thanks.
While quoting, discussing such links helps the members of this forum somewhat in keeping the buzz, I feel we must have focussed efforts on specific provisions that will improve the issues faced by legal immigrants. It is possible that this is easier to achieve than a Comprehensive Immigration Reform that this articles speaks about. Thanks to apnair2002 for the post.
Welcome Learning01 on the forum after a brief hiatus. You are the current record holder for maximum number of posts and I hope you continue to post messages helping all members on the forum. thanks.
wallpaper images Kelly Rowland
abq_gc
08-14 08:19 PM
i got an RFE on my AP... don't know yet what it's about though..
had the same question as you...whether these applications are mutually exclusive or not..
abq_gc
had the same question as you...whether these applications are mutually exclusive or not..
abq_gc
chanduv23
10-16 03:46 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^
2011 Motivation, Kelly Rowland
GCVivek
03-23 03:14 PM
Why didn't you ask what the interview was about and why the Welcome was issued when your priority date was not current?
In immigration matters it is best to be open and clear lest you fall in situations where you have to hibernate because you can't raise the issue for fear of rejection.
In immigration matters it is best to be open and clear lest you fall in situations where you have to hibernate because you can't raise the issue for fear of rejection.
more...
srigc2010
03-08 10:17 AM
Hi Everyone,
I did not get back any responses. So I am posting it again. Can someone please advice?
My PD is EB2March 2005.
My position titles are not same though the job is similar.
My salary is 35% more
Please advice if it is too risky to file for AC21
I did not get back any responses. So I am posting it again. Can someone please advice?
My PD is EB2March 2005.
My position titles are not same though the job is similar.
My salary is 35% more
Please advice if it is too risky to file for AC21
need4gc
09-08 05:30 PM
I called USCIS and got the information.....they had already generated the receipt number
more...
Googler
07-19 01:26 AM
Read Section D of the Ombudsmans 2007 report. He also discussed some of these issues in the 2006 report.
2010 kelly rowland motivation album
Malayka
01-18 07:40 PM
Thanks bluesoft for your response. I was thinking of the same thing but if i do renewal of green card is there a federal background check, if there is i might be rejected that as well.
Any suggestions??? thank you
Any suggestions??? thank you
more...
orshoe
03-19 04:39 PM
My labor was filed with job title from the employer as IT Lead (O*Net Code - 11-3021.00, O*Net title - Computer and Information Systems Managers). I am having an opportunity to convert to full-time on EAD (I-140 approved, EAD received 18months back). The new job title is Software Engineer(possible O*Net codes - 15-1032.00/15-1021.00/15-1031.00, possible O*Net title - Computer Software Engineer/Computer Programmer). Is it possible to file AC21 in this scenario. The salary and the job descriptions for both the Labor filing and the new opportunity are similar. I am worried if the title might cause a problem. I have to make a decision very soon. Please help.
hair kelly rowland motivation album
ngarugs
02-09 08:36 PM
"Senate leadership is comfortable with a proposal to solve retrogression for Schedule A occupation -- registered nurses and physical therapists. It was through grassroots advocacy that we were able to explain to the Senate leadership just how important this issue is. Thank you to everyone who made an effort.
We now must turn our efforts toward the House."
(and goes on with....)
"Rep. Lofgren (D - CA) : 16th District - San Jose
Rep. Eshoo (D- CA) : 14th District - San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Cruz
Rep. Pelosi (D - CA) : 8th District - San Francisco and north
Essentially anyone who is located in the Bay Area and wants to see retrogression solved should contact their hospital leadership and see if they are willing to make a few phone calls" (*click HLG (http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/) for details)
We now must turn our efforts toward the House."
(and goes on with....)
"Rep. Lofgren (D - CA) : 16th District - San Jose
Rep. Eshoo (D- CA) : 14th District - San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Cruz
Rep. Pelosi (D - CA) : 8th District - San Francisco and north
Essentially anyone who is located in the Bay Area and wants to see retrogression solved should contact their hospital leadership and see if they are willing to make a few phone calls" (*click HLG (http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/) for details)
more...
roseball
03-07 11:03 PM
My company filed my 7th year H1 extension and my wife's H4 petition at the same time in Dec 2006. USCIS online case status shows received and in process for both H1 and H4.
Recently, we upgraded to premium processing. However, only the H1 case status now shows as being done under premium processing. Does that mean that only my H1 will be premium processed and not H4 even though they both were filed together. Is this normal. I am hoping both H1 and H4 will be premium processed. I know that USCIS adjudicates H4 also in premium processing for such cases as a courtesy. Just wanted to know if anyone has been under similar situation before and got only their H1 approved in premium and not H4....The whole purpose of me upgrading to PP was to get H4 approved before the H1 quota begins in April as our H1/H4 were expiring this summer and my wife's employer is filing a H1 COS petition for her in PP under the 2008 H1 quota....Didn't want to take any chance of her H1 COS getting approved without a I-94 because of her current H4 expiring in summer.
Thanks in advance.
Recently, we upgraded to premium processing. However, only the H1 case status now shows as being done under premium processing. Does that mean that only my H1 will be premium processed and not H4 even though they both were filed together. Is this normal. I am hoping both H1 and H4 will be premium processed. I know that USCIS adjudicates H4 also in premium processing for such cases as a courtesy. Just wanted to know if anyone has been under similar situation before and got only their H1 approved in premium and not H4....The whole purpose of me upgrading to PP was to get H4 approved before the H1 quota begins in April as our H1/H4 were expiring this summer and my wife's employer is filing a H1 COS petition for her in PP under the 2008 H1 quota....Didn't want to take any chance of her H1 COS getting approved without a I-94 because of her current H4 expiring in summer.
Thanks in advance.
hot Kelly Rowland amp; Big Sean - Lay
kaisersose
07-31 12:01 AM
I have applied I485 when i was in India and it is in pending now.I am back from India and currently in USA now and came to know that one cannot file I485 when the applicant is not in USA.
Should i be withdrawing the pending I485 and reapply now ?since there is a date availability till august 17th 2007
Or Can I appply new I485 without withdrawing the pending I485 .Once I get new receipt notice ,then withdrw the old pending I485?
Please suggest .Thanks in advance.
These are critical decisions and you should consult a knowledgeable attorney ASAP to know your options and possible risks. If you used an attorney to file your 485 from India, then you know that this attorney is no good.
Should i be withdrawing the pending I485 and reapply now ?since there is a date availability till august 17th 2007
Or Can I appply new I485 without withdrawing the pending I485 .Once I get new receipt notice ,then withdrw the old pending I485?
Please suggest .Thanks in advance.
These are critical decisions and you should consult a knowledgeable attorney ASAP to know your options and possible risks. If you used an attorney to file your 485 from India, then you know that this attorney is no good.
more...
house SINGLE: KELLY ROWLAND
langagadu
08-19 11:20 PM
That message from him is close to 2 years old.
Hey vldrao
We are meeting for last couple of weeks as part of the State Chapter. Are you currently member of our State Chapter? If not send me a request to the State Chapter link on my signature.
Hey vldrao
We are meeting for last couple of weeks as part of the State Chapter. Are you currently member of our State Chapter? If not send me a request to the State Chapter link on my signature.
tattoo Kelly Rowland#39;s saucy Lil
gipsydance
08-24 10:04 AM
Me, Masters In EE, Working in Medical Instrumentation at University.
Papers: 1st author 3, other 7
Conference/Posters: 1st author 3, other 13
Recommendation letters: 7
Papers: 1st author 3, other 7
Conference/Posters: 1st author 3, other 13
Recommendation letters: 7
more...
pictures @JimmiiMontana Kelly Rowland
kirupa
05-27 03:19 PM
They both look really nice amit. I have added them both up!
dresses Kelly Rowland - Motivation
rohitgopidi
04-06 11:38 PM
Hi ALL,
I'm a newbie in the forum and i need help from all regarding the below issue i have.
I'm a F1 student and presently working as a Software Engineer.I have been on OPT from January 2010 and i have recently got an extension for another 17 months which is a total of 29 months of OPT from January 2010 till June 2012, My main question was when do i need to apply for H1 and are there different types of H1?
What are the dates for applying for H1 and the start date for H1?
I will be done with my OPT by June 2012, so when should i start my H1 filling and is there any way that i can extend my status?
what are the ways of applying for H1?
Sorry if i have been asking the same question which has been answered before, if so please do not mind to direct me to that particular page
Thanks,
Rohit
I'm a newbie in the forum and i need help from all regarding the below issue i have.
I'm a F1 student and presently working as a Software Engineer.I have been on OPT from January 2010 and i have recently got an extension for another 17 months which is a total of 29 months of OPT from January 2010 till June 2012, My main question was when do i need to apply for H1 and are there different types of H1?
What are the dates for applying for H1 and the start date for H1?
I will be done with my OPT by June 2012, so when should i start my H1 filling and is there any way that i can extend my status?
what are the ways of applying for H1?
Sorry if i have been asking the same question which has been answered before, if so please do not mind to direct me to that particular page
Thanks,
Rohit
more...
makeup album cover. kelly rowland
sangmami
04-19 05:31 PM
I am changing jobs from ohio to another state ,job title and description are same..but the pay mght be 20%less....
Is this gonna be a problem or is it ok if the new pay is more than the prevailing wage for that state..for the same job description.
My details..
7th yr of h1b
pd 2007 mar
i 485 filed---during july 2007
will use ac21 for the future job?
Thanks..
Is this gonna be a problem or is it ok if the new pay is more than the prevailing wage for that state..for the same job description.
My details..
7th yr of h1b
pd 2007 mar
i 485 filed---during july 2007
will use ac21 for the future job?
Thanks..
girlfriend Kelly#39;s Motivation
H1B-GC
06-04 03:52 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Green%20Card/Green%20Card%20Through%20a%20Job/Employment%20Based%20I-485%20Pending%20Inventory%20as%20of%20May%2027%202 010.pdf
hairstyles Kelly Rowland
auvrm
05-18 06:18 PM
(I'm a new member to this forum)
My H1B extension was approved for only 6 months, based on the SOW (Client Contract) end date (rather than the usual 3 year extension).
I would be just about in my maternity leave for the pregnancy during the petition expiry and if my further extension is denied (god forbid), I was told that I would be terminated from my employers' payroll and I have to leave the country or change my status to Student, Visitor etc.
FYI: I'm working for this company since Oct 2005.
Is there any law that prohibits termination of a worker during her PREGNANCY DISABILITY LEAVE (MATERNITY LEAVE) Or FMLA (Family and Medical Leave) on the basis that the USCIS didn't approve the petition (god forbid)?
My H1B extension was approved for only 6 months, based on the SOW (Client Contract) end date (rather than the usual 3 year extension).
I would be just about in my maternity leave for the pregnancy during the petition expiry and if my further extension is denied (god forbid), I was told that I would be terminated from my employers' payroll and I have to leave the country or change my status to Student, Visitor etc.
FYI: I'm working for this company since Oct 2005.
Is there any law that prohibits termination of a worker during her PREGNANCY DISABILITY LEAVE (MATERNITY LEAVE) Or FMLA (Family and Medical Leave) on the basis that the USCIS didn't approve the petition (god forbid)?
jerrygreat
11-25 09:09 PM
Hello, All buddies:
My case is a little special:
After my wife (H-1B) filed I-140/I-485, I got EAD in Dec 2006, and I (H4)started to work by using EAD from Jan 2, 2007. On May 10, 2007, we received I-140/I485 denial letter. we filed a reopen and reconsideration for I-140 denial. I was still using that EAD for work (it is vaild from Dec 2006-Dec 2007) during that time. In November 27. 2007, I changed my visa from H4=>H1.(I was not being asked by USCIS to go aborad for re-stamping H1, anyway it is approved). The USCIS denied our Reopen and Reconsideration for I-140 again later in March 2008.
Now the comany sponsor me to apply for EB2 green card.
Usaually, when using EAD, your status is AOS, and when I-140/I485 denied,
you lose your status. In my case, from May 10-Nov 27, I maybe already lose
my status. however, H4=>H1 is OK without any problem.
My question
1.
I worried that in the future, in the stage of waiting for I-485 approval, does USCIS can find out that I have the above problem between May 10-Nov 27, (it is over 180 days)?!
--However, during that period, I have a I-140 reopen and reconsideration case pending?--does this mean legally staying in US? (even it denied again later)
2.
If this is a problem, do I had better go home country/re-entry US once to clean these mess?
3.
However, I am over 180 days, is that possible that I can not come back?
Thank you very much in advance.
Jerry
My case is a little special:
After my wife (H-1B) filed I-140/I-485, I got EAD in Dec 2006, and I (H4)started to work by using EAD from Jan 2, 2007. On May 10, 2007, we received I-140/I485 denial letter. we filed a reopen and reconsideration for I-140 denial. I was still using that EAD for work (it is vaild from Dec 2006-Dec 2007) during that time. In November 27. 2007, I changed my visa from H4=>H1.(I was not being asked by USCIS to go aborad for re-stamping H1, anyway it is approved). The USCIS denied our Reopen and Reconsideration for I-140 again later in March 2008.
Now the comany sponsor me to apply for EB2 green card.
Usaually, when using EAD, your status is AOS, and when I-140/I485 denied,
you lose your status. In my case, from May 10-Nov 27, I maybe already lose
my status. however, H4=>H1 is OK without any problem.
My question
1.
I worried that in the future, in the stage of waiting for I-485 approval, does USCIS can find out that I have the above problem between May 10-Nov 27, (it is over 180 days)?!
--However, during that period, I have a I-140 reopen and reconsideration case pending?--does this mean legally staying in US? (even it denied again later)
2.
If this is a problem, do I had better go home country/re-entry US once to clean these mess?
3.
However, I am over 180 days, is that possible that I can not come back?
Thank you very much in advance.
Jerry
gc_hanged
01-05 06:22 AM
After The Fall: Making Sense Out Of Sensenbrenner by Gary Endelman (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2006,0104-endelman.shtm#bio)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)
Now we know how Tom Paine felt at Valley Forge. It has been a cold December for those who think immigration is good for America. On December 16th, the House of Representatives approved the Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005(H.R.4437), perhaps the most draconian bill of recent memory, and, a mere three days later, the House approved an agreement with the Senate on a comprehensive budget reconciliation package stripped bare of any pro-immigration provisions. While there is some satisfaction in the fact that the House did not get the higher L fees that it sought, this is cold comfort. Truth be told, it was a tough week, the worst in a long time, and the shock among pro-immigration circles, both on Capitol Hill and beyond, is palpable.
Removal of Section 8001 from the Budget Reconciliation Conference Report can be a temporary setback if we play our cards right. Congressman Sensenbrenner has long and loudly proclaimed that he is not against all immigration, just the illegal variety. Fine. Let�s take him at his word. He is, after all, the architect of the new E-3 visa that enables 10,500 Australians to get around the H-1B cap. Congressman Sensenbrenner has his enforcement-only bill now so he should be prepared to support us when we seek to attach Section 8001 to broadly bipartisan legislation in the upcoming session of Congress. If Congressman Sensenbrenner means what he says, and he usually does, this might be a golden opportunity to bring Section 8001 back to life.
Source: www.ilw.com (http://www.ilw.com)