reverendflash
10-07 08:34 PM
probably because they can't be altered unless you own Acrobat Writer, and also they print out easily on Mac, and PC...
-from what I've seen,
Rev:elderly:
-from what I've seen,
Rev:elderly:
wallpaper images Transformer The Game
aachoo
04-20 01:40 PM
I have been working for a private company LLC that operated as 3 smaller LLCs (regionally) but had the same/very similar names (e.g. XYZ, XYZ Asia).
I had H1Bs , LC, 140, 485 with this company.
Right now-
I have an approved 797 until 2010, but stamp expired in 2006
PD- Dec 2004
LC approved in 2006
140 approved 2007
485 applied July 2, 2007
Got EAD, AP in Aug 2007
Entered the US on AP in Dec 2007
The company and its regional entities changed the corporate structure and are now under a new legal entity name- XYZ (same as above). This happened after I got my EAD. To an outsider or our clients- there is no change. I have not signed any new employment papers with the new legal entity. Other than the address on my paystubs changing from my local headquarters to the WW headquarters nothing has changed for me.
Questions
Should I avail AC21/EAD because I am technically working for a different company?
Since this new entity has taken on the responsibilities for the old one, should I file something with the USCIS if they happen to check on the old entity when they adjudicate the 485?
Thanks in advance.
-a
I had H1Bs , LC, 140, 485 with this company.
Right now-
I have an approved 797 until 2010, but stamp expired in 2006
PD- Dec 2004
LC approved in 2006
140 approved 2007
485 applied July 2, 2007
Got EAD, AP in Aug 2007
Entered the US on AP in Dec 2007
The company and its regional entities changed the corporate structure and are now under a new legal entity name- XYZ (same as above). This happened after I got my EAD. To an outsider or our clients- there is no change. I have not signed any new employment papers with the new legal entity. Other than the address on my paystubs changing from my local headquarters to the WW headquarters nothing has changed for me.
Questions
Should I avail AC21/EAD because I am technically working for a different company?
Since this new entity has taken on the responsibilities for the old one, should I file something with the USCIS if they happen to check on the old entity when they adjudicate the 485?
Thanks in advance.
-a
logiclife
06-04 01:12 PM
There are still some new members who keep posting that the bill S 1348 looks very good and it has SKIL provisions etc, because they get pointed to the last year's bill.
If you go on thomas.loc.gov and find bill text for S. 1348 you see a bill that is a copy-paste version of LAST YEAR'S SENATE BILL S. 2611.
That text is last years text that was initially put in place as a place-holder BEFORE the grand compromise was reached.
After the grand bargin (compromise/coalition) was reached, the text of the grand compromise replaced the entire text of last year's bill (that has SKIL) was the next text.
Amendment # 1150 (S.A. 1150) Sponsored by Sen. Kennedy is a 400 page amendment that replaces the entire text that was intially in the bill with the new text. Its a "Substitute" amendment.
Read the S. A. 1150 text. Its also on IV homepage as PDF. That is the bill now. Here is the link to that
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/forums/Immigration_Bill_Substitute.pdf
If you go on thomas.loc.gov and find bill text for S. 1348 you see a bill that is a copy-paste version of LAST YEAR'S SENATE BILL S. 2611.
That text is last years text that was initially put in place as a place-holder BEFORE the grand compromise was reached.
After the grand bargin (compromise/coalition) was reached, the text of the grand compromise replaced the entire text of last year's bill (that has SKIL) was the next text.
Amendment # 1150 (S.A. 1150) Sponsored by Sen. Kennedy is a 400 page amendment that replaces the entire text that was intially in the bill with the new text. Its a "Substitute" amendment.
Read the S. A. 1150 text. Its also on IV homepage as PDF. That is the bill now. Here is the link to that
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/forums/Immigration_Bill_Substitute.pdf
2011 Transformers: Dark of the Moon
surabhi
06-08 08:52 AM
You will be able to return to same employer if you get employed again with your old employer.
Alternatively, you can file new H1 with a new employer. YOu dont need to go visa stamping, but your son need to go in either case.
Make sure you either have a project with client letter or your employer has position to employ you on genuine internal project that can be documented well. Its not question of past pay stubs for you. Its about having valid and verifiable employment now.
Alternatively, you can file new H1 with a new employer. YOu dont need to go visa stamping, but your son need to go in either case.
Make sure you either have a project with client letter or your employer has position to employ you on genuine internal project that can be documented well. Its not question of past pay stubs for you. Its about having valid and verifiable employment now.
more...
__scaled_500.jpg "Dark of the Moon Shockwave")
ndev2k
12-08 04:52 AM
Thanks
Tommy_S
04-08 11:58 AM
wow! Very creative, fes. Those stamps gonna be pop. :thumb:
more...
Blog Feeds
05-19 10:00 AM
Republican Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich continues to stake out his claim as the sole moderate on immigration in the GOP campaign. Politico reports that he is in favor of a legalization program that will allow "citizen boards" (similar to the draft boards of an earlier era) to determine whether undocumented immigrants deserve to stay in the US. He explicitly rejected a path to legalization. Gingrich is considered a favorite of those in the Tea Party and the candidate's more enlightened positions on immigration support the argument that not all those in the Tea Party are hardliners on immigration.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/gingrich-endorses-legalization-of-the-undocumented.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/gingrich-endorses-legalization-of-the-undocumented.html)
2010 Transformers Dark of the Moon
vxg
03-27 11:34 PM
Murthy has published interesting details on this check this
http://murthy.com/bulletin.html
This is straight from Chief, U.S. Department of State (DOS).
http://murthy.com/bulletin.html
This is straight from Chief, U.S. Department of State (DOS).
more...
jthomas
05-16 08:34 PM
Since you are in H1B the employer would book your ticket to US and secondly, if in any case if you have to go back the employer would give you a return ticket back. That's what most of the employers do.
After reaching US, be active in IV forums as well as join the state chapter.
All the best.
J Thomas
I'm coming to the US for the first time on H1B. Do I need a one way or a return ticket? My travel agent told me that since I have a multiple entry visa (expiring on Oct 2011) a return ticket is not required unless I need to travel back home within one year. Could someone with knowledge about this issue help me out. I would really appreciate a reply from someone who recently landed in the US on H1B.
Thanks
After reaching US, be active in IV forums as well as join the state chapter.
All the best.
J Thomas
I'm coming to the US for the first time on H1B. Do I need a one way or a return ticket? My travel agent told me that since I have a multiple entry visa (expiring on Oct 2011) a return ticket is not required unless I need to travel back home within one year. Could someone with knowledge about this issue help me out. I would really appreciate a reply from someone who recently landed in the US on H1B.
Thanks
hair for “Tranformers: Dark of
Lasantha
01-15 04:49 PM
Do you actually need Paychecks and Employment Letter when travelling with AP ? Or are you just taking them as a precaution?
I'll be going to carry following documents. Please see document no also, and let me know if I have all right documents for re-entry.
Please help.
Thanks.
For me
485 RECEIPT - I- 797C
Ap Approval Notice - I512L
Paychecks
Employment Letter
For my wife
485 RECEIPT - I- 797C
Ap Approval Notice - I512L
My Paychecks
My Employment Letter
I'll be going to carry following documents. Please see document no also, and let me know if I have all right documents for re-entry.
Please help.
Thanks.
For me
485 RECEIPT - I- 797C
Ap Approval Notice - I512L
Paychecks
Employment Letter
For my wife
485 RECEIPT - I- 797C
Ap Approval Notice - I512L
My Paychecks
My Employment Letter
more...
memyselfandus
03-06 08:14 AM
these rallies are usually organized by Undocumented workers. Folks at immigrationvoice strongly believe that people should not highlight any events related to undocument workers on this site...Hence reds for you...
now suddenly I got "Red". don't know what's the bloody reason.
now suddenly I got "Red". don't know what's the bloody reason.
hot Dark of the Moon Shockwave
confu
08-26 04:25 PM
A friend of mine told me that we do not have to pay Social Security Tax while working on EAD. Does anybody know if this is true ?
That would be a huge plus in case its true.
That would be a huge plus in case its true.
more...
house transformers-dark-of-the-moon-
buntee2
06-17 11:50 AM
This is preposterous. It should not take that long. Please keep me updated and let me know when you receive your receipt.
tattoo New Transformers Dark of the
CRAZYMONK
03-18 02:44 PM
If that is the case, why don't you opt for 1 and not go for stamping? Indeed you don't need to if you are planning to use AP.
more...
pictures transformers-dark-of-the-moon-
meg_z
09-12 08:18 AM
It seems to be the LC filed before 4/30/01. Below are the ones from PBPC.
Title
COOK (11)
Cleaning Crew Member (5)
Carpenter (5)
Painter (3)
Software Engineer (3)
Retail Store Manager (2)
Baker (2)
Maintenance Worker (2)
Italian Cook (2)
Programmer Analyst (2)
WELDER (2)
Assistant Manager (2)
Woodworker (1)
Fashion Designers (1)
Manicurist (1)
The system is definately broken. Most ads are joke. It is sad to think that my 1st LC (12/2001) in NY was stuck because of these. Thanks.
Title
COOK (11)
Cleaning Crew Member (5)
Carpenter (5)
Painter (3)
Software Engineer (3)
Retail Store Manager (2)
Baker (2)
Maintenance Worker (2)
Italian Cook (2)
Programmer Analyst (2)
WELDER (2)
Assistant Manager (2)
Woodworker (1)
Fashion Designers (1)
Manicurist (1)
The system is definately broken. Most ads are joke. It is sad to think that my 1st LC (12/2001) in NY was stuck because of these. Thanks.
dresses transformers dark of the moon
RNGC
10-01 09:04 PM
Applied for AP/EAD/485 in July 07.....I know that I can invoke AC21 after 180 days and change jobs.....My question is ,
1. If I travel to India before the 180 days and use the AP when I return, is it like invoking AC21 before 180 days ?
2. what are the consequences of using AP within 180 days after filing for 485 ?
3. Is AP and AC21 related ? [brother, sister , cousin :) ]
Thanks.
1. If I travel to India before the 180 days and use the AP when I return, is it like invoking AC21 before 180 days ?
2. what are the consequences of using AP within 180 days after filing for 485 ?
3. Is AP and AC21 related ? [brother, sister , cousin :) ]
Thanks.
more...
makeup dresses transformers dark of
nkavjs
11-07 09:16 PM
On USCIS website, my I131 messages says as Document approved and..so on on Nov 1. Till date I haven'yt recd. any copies yet. Will it come to me or Lawyers?
Thxs
Thxs
girlfriend Have you played the game?
morchu
05-18 11:58 AM
True up to some extent. When filing AOS, you still "intent" to join for the exact same employment (including location), as specified in your LC. You are NOT required to take that exact employment "at the time" of filing AOS. What is required "at the time of filing AOS" is to have a legitimate intention to take that exact employment upon GC. By joining for that exact employment from anytime now, will actually help in proving the "legitimacy" of your intention (but not "required").
My LC and I-140 was approved with my ex-employer in CA.Now I have a oppurtunity to join my ex-employer in the east coast. Will I be able to file AOS if I join in a similar role and when my PD becomes current ? The immigration lawyer of my ex-employer told me that I have to join in the same location as my LC was approved to take advantage of AOS as it is location specific. Is it true?
Thanks
Member of north calif
dontation : $500
My LC and I-140 was approved with my ex-employer in CA.Now I have a oppurtunity to join my ex-employer in the east coast. Will I be able to file AOS if I join in a similar role and when my PD becomes current ? The immigration lawyer of my ex-employer told me that I have to join in the same location as my LC was approved to take advantage of AOS as it is location specific. Is it true?
Thanks
Member of north calif
dontation : $500
hairstyles TRANSFORMERS Dark of the Moon
nixstor
02-09 06:51 PM
You cannot claim a cousin on F1 status to be your dependent.
The most important point is F1 students have to file their own 1040NR and are Non resident aliens for tax purposes and cannot be dependents on Resident alients.
More over You cannot claim the tuition deduction for her because
(1) she showed proof of financial ability when joined the school.
(2) AFAIK, Tuition deduction can be made only for people either you/your spouse or your dependents
I know this because I paid tuition for my own sister and I was told that I cannot claim her as a dependent. Some CPA might say the contrary, but if you want the exact info call the IRS 800 829 1040
The most important point is F1 students have to file their own 1040NR and are Non resident aliens for tax purposes and cannot be dependents on Resident alients.
More over You cannot claim the tuition deduction for her because
(1) she showed proof of financial ability when joined the school.
(2) AFAIK, Tuition deduction can be made only for people either you/your spouse or your dependents
I know this because I paid tuition for my own sister and I was told that I cannot claim her as a dependent. Some CPA might say the contrary, but if you want the exact info call the IRS 800 829 1040
rdehar
10-07 11:59 AM
Thanks for your reply.
Is there any way that i can start working immeadiatly after getting the approval (May 2010), like Premium processing or COS immeadiatly ?
Thanks,
-Srinivas
ravise is absolutely right, u will get H1 for the period remaining (6 years minus time spent on L1). Also, if u file in next year's quota (filing starts in Apr 2010), it cannot have a start date earlier than Oct 1, 2010. I don't think u can start working on H1 before that date, even if u file premium.
Why don't u ask you company to file in current year's quota -- there are still visas available.
Is there any way that i can start working immeadiatly after getting the approval (May 2010), like Premium processing or COS immeadiatly ?
Thanks,
-Srinivas
ravise is absolutely right, u will get H1 for the period remaining (6 years minus time spent on L1). Also, if u file in next year's quota (filing starts in Apr 2010), it cannot have a start date earlier than Oct 1, 2010. I don't think u can start working on H1 before that date, even if u file premium.
Why don't u ask you company to file in current year's quota -- there are still visas available.
ravi98
11-24 12:13 PM
Ezra Klein - Should states set their own immigration quotas? (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/11/should_states_set_their_own_im.html)
The Kauffman Foundation has a report out ranking the "new economy" states. Their methodology "measures the extent to which state economies are knowledge-based, globalized, entrepreneurial, IT-driven and innovation-based � in other words, to what degree state economies� structures and operations match the ideal structure of the New Economy." The winners? Massachusetts, Washington, Maryland, New Jersey and Connecticut. The laggards? Mississippi, West Virginia, Arkansas, Alabama and Wyoming.
I never really know what to make of reports like this, but one of the metrics is "immigration of knowledge workers," which really isn't under the control of individual states. Visa quotas are set by the federal government. But why? There are a lot of places where a national solution really is best, but that seems particularly untrue in immigration. Detroit, for instance, has a lot of empty houses, a lot of shuttered factories, and a lot of emigration. They could probably use a bunch of immigrants to occupy homes, buy things, and start businesses. Similarly, California has had a pretty good experience with letting highly skilled immigrants start tech firms in the Northern part of the state. Maybe they'd like to let even more of them in to do it. These graphs explain the potential appeal (click for a larger version):
immigrantbusinesses.jpg
There are obvious difficulties with having a California visa that doesn't work in Oregon. But we have limited visas now -- think student visas, or temporary agricultural workers -- and we seem to get by all right. Another concern would be that certain states would be overtaken by xenophobia and basically shut off immigration, though Arizona suggests that you can do quite a lot to make immigrants miserable even without changing the number of available visas, and my hunch is that any state that went too far in this direction would face a tremendous outcry from its business community.
The Kauffman Foundation has a report out ranking the "new economy" states. Their methodology "measures the extent to which state economies are knowledge-based, globalized, entrepreneurial, IT-driven and innovation-based � in other words, to what degree state economies� structures and operations match the ideal structure of the New Economy." The winners? Massachusetts, Washington, Maryland, New Jersey and Connecticut. The laggards? Mississippi, West Virginia, Arkansas, Alabama and Wyoming.
I never really know what to make of reports like this, but one of the metrics is "immigration of knowledge workers," which really isn't under the control of individual states. Visa quotas are set by the federal government. But why? There are a lot of places where a national solution really is best, but that seems particularly untrue in immigration. Detroit, for instance, has a lot of empty houses, a lot of shuttered factories, and a lot of emigration. They could probably use a bunch of immigrants to occupy homes, buy things, and start businesses. Similarly, California has had a pretty good experience with letting highly skilled immigrants start tech firms in the Northern part of the state. Maybe they'd like to let even more of them in to do it. These graphs explain the potential appeal (click for a larger version):
immigrantbusinesses.jpg
There are obvious difficulties with having a California visa that doesn't work in Oregon. But we have limited visas now -- think student visas, or temporary agricultural workers -- and we seem to get by all right. Another concern would be that certain states would be overtaken by xenophobia and basically shut off immigration, though Arizona suggests that you can do quite a lot to make immigrants miserable even without changing the number of available visas, and my hunch is that any state that went too far in this direction would face a tremendous outcry from its business community.